{"id":1172,"date":"2024-11-05T19:06:32","date_gmt":"2024-11-05T17:06:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/lei\/?page_id=1172"},"modified":"2025-05-19T13:54:22","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T11:54:22","slug":"a2-1-morphology-in-signed-language","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/toc\/a2-1-morphology-in-signed-language\/","title":{"rendered":"Appendix 2. Morphology in signed language"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The modality of communication contributes to the structure of languages. Sign languages display a radically different type of morphology than spoken languages do. Sign languages combine two fundamentally different word formation processes: On the one hand, there is a rich, complex and simultaneous process of affixation (fusional). In contrary and addition to that, they show a rather simple and sequential type of morphology (agglutinative). Aranoff et al. (2005) call it the <em>Paradox Of Sign Language Morphology<\/em> since we know of no spoken language showing this morphological dichotomy.<\/p>\n<p>Why is that? Sign languages are spatial. Signers use their hands, face, and body to sign words and they use their eyes to perceive them. This allows for a spatio-temporal representation of concepts in a more immediate and iconic, not entirely arbitrary manner. Signs &#8220;are motivated representations of certain visuo-spatial concepts like source, goal, theme, path, and size or shape of an object.&#8221; (Aranoff et al. 2005, 303). This integral property sign languages have allows for a more direct connection between form and meaning which can lead to a quicker language development than spoken languages show (see ibid.). <br \/>\nAs Aranoff et al. point out, sign languages are neither completely iconic nor completely arbitrary (ibid., 338).<\/p>\n<p>Below are some examples of the major differences between sign language and spoken language morphology. This page is meant to give an impression rather than a comprehensive introduction to the linguistics of sign language.<\/p>\n<h3>Simultaneous affixation<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Simultaneous affixes<\/strong> are common in signed languages and in languages with tone. When signing, it\u2019s possible to do things with multiple articulators (a second hand, or your face), or to add motion on top of a sign, in a way that is not possible with oral articulations in spoken languages.<\/p>\n<p><!-- written by RH below--><\/p>\n<h4>Aspect<\/h4>\n<p><!-- original below--><\/p>\n<p>For example, in ASL there is a morpheme that attaches to verbs to express <strong>continuative aspect<\/strong> (the meaning that something happens continuously for a while, or for a long time). This morpheme involves adding a particular circular motion to the base sign for the verb; this circular motion doesn\u2019t happen before or after the verb, but simultaneously with it. You can see the application of this affix in the first and last videos for the verb STUDY <a href=\"https:\/\/www.handspeak.com\/learn\/index.php?id=189\">in this linked article<\/a> from the online Handspeak ASL dictionary (Lapiak 1995\u20132022) (the second video in that post shows the application of a different simultaneous affix, one for iterative aspect).<\/p>\n<p><!-- written by RH below--><\/p>\n<h4>Verb agreement<\/h4>\n<p>Sign languages have three verb classes: plain, spatial and agreement verbs. While plain verbs have invariant beginning and end points, spatial verbs can refer to locations. For example, MOVE, PUT, HAND (over): The so-called\u00a0<em>path<\/em> of the verb begins at location A and ends at location B. Agreement verbs agree with syntactic roles, i.e. subject and object, of the sentence. In GIVE, the path of the verb starts at the location of the person giving and ends at the location of the receiver.<\/p>\n<h4>Gender<\/h4>\n<p>To add social gender to a noun like <em>sibling <\/em>or <em>parent<\/em>, the location where the signing begins is changed: <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/1283\/father\/0\/?q=father\">FATHER<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/1435\/brother\/0\/?q=brother\">BROTHER<\/a> start with the right hand positioned at the forehead. <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/1284\/mother\/0\/?q=mother\">MOTHER<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/1436\/sister\/0\/?q=sister\">SISTER<\/a> begin at the chin. To express a gender neutral term for <em>cousin<\/em>, the sign orginates at the cheekbone which is between the forehead (i.e. MALE) and the chin (i.e. FEMALE), see <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/1445\/cousin\/0\/?q=cousin\">COUSIN<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h4>Numeral incorporation<\/h4>\n<p>Another example is <strong>numeral incorporation\u00a0<\/strong>for numerals from one to nine. For example, in ASL, the sign for <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/1618\/hour\/0\/?q=hour\">HOUR<\/a> involves one hand imitating a clock by forming a flat left hand on which the active hand signs a circular movement to signify a whole circle of the rotating big hand on the clock. When signing ONE HOUR, the right finders sign <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/639\/one\/0\/?q=one\">ONE<\/a> while the movement of both hands stay the same. When signing TWO HOURS, the right fingers sign <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/7396\/two\/0\/?q=two\">TWO<\/a> and so on. For TEN HOURS and above, the signs are compound words signing HOUR-TEN in a successive order.<\/p>\n<p>The same applies for signing age. The sign for AGE is a closing fist moving down from the chin. To sign the ages one to nine, the right fingers sign the number while the hand movement remains the same. For TEN YEARS OLD and above, the signs are signed in a successive order: AGE-TEN. The fifth video on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.handspeak.com\/learn\/134\/\">this page<\/a> shows the blending of age and numerals.<\/p>\n<p>The same applies to other countable nouns like DOLLAR and CENTS, SECONDS, MINUTES, DAYS, WEEKS, MONTHS and YEARS.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Sequential affixation<\/h3>\n<p><!-- written by RH below--><\/p>\n<h4>Negation<\/h4>\n<p>For example, in Israeli Sign Language (ISL), one of the signs for negation is a suffix. It attaches to and immediately follows the adjective (see <em>Allomorphy <\/em>below).<\/p>\n<h4>Compounds<\/h4>\n<p>Compounds in sign language can be built by combining two words. This can be seen with the word <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/4675\/greenhouse\/0\/?q=greenhouse\">GREENHOUSE<\/a>: It is a combination of <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/578\/green\/0\/?q=green\">GREEN<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/590\/house\/0\/?q=house\">HOUSE<\/a>. For the word <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/9422\/medical-bag\/0\/?q=medical+bag\">MEDICAL BAG<\/a>, the words <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/13808\/medicine\/0\/?q=medicine\">MEDICINE<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/spreadthesign.com\/en.us\/word\/714\/bag\/0\/?q=bag\">BAG<\/a> are signed one after the other.<\/p>\n<h3>\u00a0<\/h3>\n<h3>Allomorphy<\/h3>\n<p>The negating suffix in ISL attaches to adjectives and can either be signed with one hand or with two hands which makes two allomorphs of the same morpheme. As with phonological conditioning, allomorphy in sign language is conditioned by the environment of the sign:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1194\" src=\"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/lei\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.08-300x140.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"140\" srcset=\"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.08-300x140.png 300w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.08-1024x478.png 1024w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.08-768x359.png 768w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.08-624x292.png 624w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.08.png 1494w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In this case, the preceding sign IMPORTANT-NOT-EXIST (&#8216;of no import&#8217;) is signed with two hands and is therefore followed by the two-handed allomorph for NOT-EXIST.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1195\" src=\"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/lei\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.16-300x176.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"176\" srcset=\"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.16-300x176.png 300w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.16-1024x602.png 1024w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.16-768x451.png 768w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.16-624x367.png 624w, https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bildschirmfoto-2024-11-09-um-09.32.16.png 1178w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>INTERESTING-NOT-EXIST (&#8216;of no interest&#8217;) only uses one hand and is therefore followed by the one-handed allomorph (cf. ibid., 331).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>References<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Aranoff, Meir, Sandler. 2005. The Paradox Of Sign Language Morphology. In: <em>Language<\/em>, 2005-06, Vol.81 (2), p.301-344, WASHINGTON: Linguistic Society of America.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The modality of communication contributes to the structure of languages. Sign languages display a radically different type of morphology than spoken languages do. Sign languages combine two fundamentally different word formation processes: On the one hand, there is a rich, complex and simultaneous process of affixation (fusional). In contrary and addition to that, they show [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":2,"menu_order":20,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1172","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1172"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1172\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1174,"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1172\/revisions\/1174"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/linguistica.info\/b\/leiwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}